<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Quest for Nutritional Truth: Why I Eat the Way I Eat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedreamlounge.net/2010/01/05/the-quest-for-nutritional-truth-why-i-eat-the-way-i-eat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedreamlounge.net/2010/01/05/the-quest-for-nutritional-truth-why-i-eat-the-way-i-eat/</link>
	<description>The Blog of Anthony &#039;Dream&#039; Johnson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 21:57:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Next “Big Thing” Goes Live April 25th&#160;&#124;&#160;The Dream Lounge</title>
		<link>http://www.thedreamlounge.net/2010/01/05/the-quest-for-nutritional-truth-why-i-eat-the-way-i-eat/comment-page-1/#comment-6690</link>
		<dc:creator>The Next “Big Thing” Goes Live April 25th&#160;&#124;&#160;The Dream Lounge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 03:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedreamlounge.net/?p=1225#comment-6690</guid>
		<description>[...] feel will have an impact on individuals, and as a by product, the rest of the world as well. Big or small, it makes little difference – it&#8217;s the idea and intent that count more than anything*. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] feel will have an impact on individuals, and as a by product, the rest of the world as well. Big or small, it makes little difference – it&#8217;s the idea and intent that count more than anything*. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew Baye on &#8220;Health Care&#8221;&#160;&#124;&#160;The Dream Lounge</title>
		<link>http://www.thedreamlounge.net/2010/01/05/the-quest-for-nutritional-truth-why-i-eat-the-way-i-eat/comment-page-1/#comment-5915</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew Baye on &#8220;Health Care&#8221;&#160;&#124;&#160;The Dream Lounge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 19:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedreamlounge.net/?p=1225#comment-5915</guid>
		<description>[...] due to the recent discussion of similar topics on here (not to mention the never ending debate on food and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] due to the recent discussion of similar topics on here (not to mention the never ending debate on food and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Does Our Generation Have the Luxury of Ignoring Reality?&#160;&#124;&#160;The Dream Lounge</title>
		<link>http://www.thedreamlounge.net/2010/01/05/the-quest-for-nutritional-truth-why-i-eat-the-way-i-eat/comment-page-1/#comment-5847</link>
		<dc:creator>Does Our Generation Have the Luxury of Ignoring Reality?&#160;&#124;&#160;The Dream Lounge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedreamlounge.net/?p=1225#comment-5847</guid>
		<description>[...] (helped) because they are voluntarily asking for help. I think a lot of us can attest to this with radical changes in diet that follow a similar path or theme (more or less &#8216;paleo&#8217; in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (helped) because they are voluntarily asking for help. I think a lot of us can attest to this with radical changes in diet that follow a similar path or theme (more or less &#8216;paleo&#8217; in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JEFF</title>
		<link>http://www.thedreamlounge.net/2010/01/05/the-quest-for-nutritional-truth-why-i-eat-the-way-i-eat/comment-page-1/#comment-5748</link>
		<dc:creator>JEFF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 02:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedreamlounge.net/?p=1225#comment-5748</guid>
		<description>Yes. Good-competition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. Good-competition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dream</title>
		<link>http://www.thedreamlounge.net/2010/01/05/the-quest-for-nutritional-truth-why-i-eat-the-way-i-eat/comment-page-1/#comment-5742</link>
		<dc:creator>Dream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedreamlounge.net/?p=1225#comment-5742</guid>
		<description>Going to use this for tomorrows post. Is this OK with you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Going to use this for tomorrows post. Is this OK with you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JEFF</title>
		<link>http://www.thedreamlounge.net/2010/01/05/the-quest-for-nutritional-truth-why-i-eat-the-way-i-eat/comment-page-1/#comment-5728</link>
		<dc:creator>JEFF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedreamlounge.net/?p=1225#comment-5728</guid>
		<description>Either way, I personally thrive on natural carbohydrate. 

I have tried your preached &#039;ketosis&#039; and perform much more poorly in anaerobic-sport competition when in this process. I THRIVE on carbohydrate. I agree SOME benefit, from &#039;ketosis&#039;. Others like myself, perform much more consistenly on carbohydrate. It all depends on the person.

With that said, carbohydrates never caused Diabetes for ANYONE. Chemical sugars like high-fructose corn syrup and refined starches, did. This is obvious as carbohydrate have existed for millions of years while diabetes did not originate until ~2,000 years ago. Recently over the summer, my best-friend died. I totally understand where you&#039;re coming from as it took an emotional toll on me. On that note, you need to put your emotions aside as the aversion to carbohydrate you yield is absolutely rediculous. After all, why would these exist if they did not have a prolonged dietetic purpose?

I also agree &#039;animals&#039; will always be a better-food choice. Point taken, this does NOT include feed lot animals! I&#039;m talking wild-caught fish and game. If these cannot be caught, then plants make a legit supplement until real animal-meat can be obtained.

As far as the debate on feed lot versus wild-caught animals, your argument is not even worth mentioning. A wild animal capable of surviving on it&#039;s own is ALWAYS a better food-source compared to a dependently raised animal.

And that bring us to the final topic. Saturated fats. And &#039;dairy&#039;-- also known as cow sourced products. You don&#039;t support dairy yet you support &#039;dairy fats&#039;? Wow, talk about a contradiction! You are absolutely correct in stating that my point of milk being for baby cows is irrelevant. That is not what I was suggesting. The point I am making is I am no longer a baby and therefore do not drink milk. Milk is made for infants, regardless of species. PERIOD. Maybe you were not breast-fed enough, in younger years?

I respectfully suggest that you browse through Superior Nutrition by Shelton in order to gain more insight. One of the few print-books worth mentioning. In turn, I will check out the website you suggested.

P.S. Everyone knows saturated fats have documented proof of being counter productive. Unless of course these fats are in the form of medium-chain tryglycerides.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Either way, I personally thrive on natural carbohydrate. </p>
<p>I have tried your preached &#8216;ketosis&#8217; and perform much more poorly in anaerobic-sport competition when in this process. I THRIVE on carbohydrate. I agree SOME benefit, from &#8216;ketosis&#8217;. Others like myself, perform much more consistenly on carbohydrate. It all depends on the person.</p>
<p>With that said, carbohydrates never caused Diabetes for ANYONE. Chemical sugars like high-fructose corn syrup and refined starches, did. This is obvious as carbohydrate have existed for millions of years while diabetes did not originate until ~2,000 years ago. Recently over the summer, my best-friend died. I totally understand where you&#8217;re coming from as it took an emotional toll on me. On that note, you need to put your emotions aside as the aversion to carbohydrate you yield is absolutely rediculous. After all, why would these exist if they did not have a prolonged dietetic purpose?</p>
<p>I also agree &#8216;animals&#8217; will always be a better-food choice. Point taken, this does NOT include feed lot animals! I&#8217;m talking wild-caught fish and game. If these cannot be caught, then plants make a legit supplement until real animal-meat can be obtained.</p>
<p>As far as the debate on feed lot versus wild-caught animals, your argument is not even worth mentioning. A wild animal capable of surviving on it&#8217;s own is ALWAYS a better food-source compared to a dependently raised animal.</p>
<p>And that bring us to the final topic. Saturated fats. And &#8216;dairy&#8217;&#8211; also known as cow sourced products. You don&#8217;t support dairy yet you support &#8216;dairy fats&#8217;? Wow, talk about a contradiction! You are absolutely correct in stating that my point of milk being for baby cows is irrelevant. That is not what I was suggesting. The point I am making is I am no longer a baby and therefore do not drink milk. Milk is made for infants, regardless of species. PERIOD. Maybe you were not breast-fed enough, in younger years?</p>
<p>I respectfully suggest that you browse through Superior Nutrition by Shelton in order to gain more insight. One of the few print-books worth mentioning. In turn, I will check out the website you suggested.</p>
<p>P.S. Everyone knows saturated fats have documented proof of being counter productive. Unless of course these fats are in the form of medium-chain tryglycerides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finer Points of Nutrition (New Thoughts on Ketosis)&#160;&#124;&#160;The Dream Lounge</title>
		<link>http://www.thedreamlounge.net/2010/01/05/the-quest-for-nutritional-truth-why-i-eat-the-way-i-eat/comment-page-1/#comment-5726</link>
		<dc:creator>Finer Points of Nutrition (New Thoughts on Ketosis)&#160;&#124;&#160;The Dream Lounge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedreamlounge.net/?p=1225#comment-5726</guid>
		<description>[...] is a comment I just posted on The Quest for Nutritional Truth: Why I Eat the Way I Eat. I believe it is worth posting as a full blog article for new and fresh discussion (that old [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is a comment I just posted on The Quest for Nutritional Truth: Why I Eat the Way I Eat. I believe it is worth posting as a full blog article for new and fresh discussion (that old [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dream</title>
		<link>http://www.thedreamlounge.net/2010/01/05/the-quest-for-nutritional-truth-why-i-eat-the-way-i-eat/comment-page-1/#comment-5725</link>
		<dc:creator>Dream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedreamlounge.net/?p=1225#comment-5725</guid>
		<description>I agree we all must continue to learn and I&#039;m glad you enjoyed the article.

Couple points

1. Metabolic typing has no basis in science or reality. I&#039;ve looked at it, and I find it as valid as vegetarianism.

2. Carbohydrate is not inherently evil, but it is a inferior source of energy as compared to fat, especially saturated. Humans are meant to dip in and out of ketosis, or stay there the majority of their lives. I&#039;ve lived in the wild and find it ridiculous to think otherwise.

3. Animals are not the only source of real food. I do not believe I stated this in the article. Animals are just always going to be superior to plants. Many &quot;plants&quot; we eat today are not &quot;food&quot; either, as discussed in the article.

4. &quot;Wild&quot; game is probably not as ideal as pasture raised animals. Wild game is prone to parasites and other problems. It&#039;s certainly better than grain fed animals, but a romantic fantasy none the less. I would be interested in eating &quot;lion&quot;, but then again I suspect the texture may be horrible to humans.

5. &quot;Dairy&quot; is a very broad term. For the record, I don&#039;t support &quot;dairy&quot;. I primarily support dairy fat, and the protein to a lesser extent. Some people can tolerate the carbohydrate from milk, but I do not believe it does anyone, any good, at all. You&#039;re arguments against milk regarding it being made for baby cows is irrelevant, as their meat is not meant solely for our consumption either.

I suggest checking out www.paleonu.com for further info on what I&#039;ve written above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree we all must continue to learn and I&#8217;m glad you enjoyed the article.</p>
<p>Couple points</p>
<p>1. Metabolic typing has no basis in science or reality. I&#8217;ve looked at it, and I find it as valid as vegetarianism.</p>
<p>2. Carbohydrate is not inherently evil, but it is a inferior source of energy as compared to fat, especially saturated. Humans are meant to dip in and out of ketosis, or stay there the majority of their lives. I&#8217;ve lived in the wild and find it ridiculous to think otherwise.</p>
<p>3. Animals are not the only source of real food. I do not believe I stated this in the article. Animals are just always going to be superior to plants. Many &#8220;plants&#8221; we eat today are not &#8220;food&#8221; either, as discussed in the article.</p>
<p>4. &#8220;Wild&#8221; game is probably not as ideal as pasture raised animals. Wild game is prone to parasites and other problems. It&#8217;s certainly better than grain fed animals, but a romantic fantasy none the less. I would be interested in eating &#8220;lion&#8221;, but then again I suspect the texture may be horrible to humans.</p>
<p>5. &#8220;Dairy&#8221; is a very broad term. For the record, I don&#8217;t support &#8220;dairy&#8221;. I primarily support dairy fat, and the protein to a lesser extent. Some people can tolerate the carbohydrate from milk, but I do not believe it does anyone, any good, at all. You&#8217;re arguments against milk regarding it being made for baby cows is irrelevant, as their meat is not meant solely for our consumption either.</p>
<p>I suggest checking out <a href="http://www.paleonu.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.paleonu.com</a> for further info on what I&#8217;ve written above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JEFF</title>
		<link>http://www.thedreamlounge.net/2010/01/05/the-quest-for-nutritional-truth-why-i-eat-the-way-i-eat/comment-page-1/#comment-5715</link>
		<dc:creator>JEFF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedreamlounge.net/?p=1225#comment-5715</guid>
		<description>Whatup, Dream! I&#039;m glad to see others my age who are actually proactive about understanding nutrition ( :

On that note, you still have a lot to learn man. As do I. Nutrition is an art, just as complex as any other high-caliber art form.

As far as macronutrients go I thrive on carbohydrate as my main energy source. Natural starches including plantains, yams and squash dominate my diet. You should look into metabolic typing, to further increase your knowledge.  We definitely ALL need proteins for tissue-repair. With that said, metabolism determines wether we thrive on carbohydrate OR fats as our main energy source. Not everyone thrives solely on fats!

As far as foods, I completely disagree with your view on animals as the ONLY source. I can tell you have definitely studied the lack luster paleo diet! For myself, I consume plants AND animals with plants as the staple. I do agree that animals make a great food source. In turn, I won&#039;t touch the standard commercial animal-products as these are far from optimal choices. I would much prefer to hunt wild, natural game like elk or ostrich as my animal choices. One good elk should last for a month or two. Ideally as humans, we will get the most out of an animal who could actually eat us. Like a lion. I desire to consume a lion. After all, we are what we eat. Why not make it to the top of the food chain? Lion meat, would be bomb.

Dairy is not an ideal food choice. It is made by cows for their calves who are in the infantry stage. These calves are too young to find foods on their own, and therefore must drink their mother&#039;s milk, straight from the source. As for humans, breast-milk is the far superior-choice as it is tailor-made for our species. Only I&#039;m not going to drink that shit ha ha. It is VERY nutritious, though only necessary for infants.

So much to talk about, in this vast subject.

P.S. None the less, good article man. I like some of your points and insights. 

JEFF</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatup, Dream! I&#8217;m glad to see others my age who are actually proactive about understanding nutrition ( :</p>
<p>On that note, you still have a lot to learn man. As do I. Nutrition is an art, just as complex as any other high-caliber art form.</p>
<p>As far as macronutrients go I thrive on carbohydrate as my main energy source. Natural starches including plantains, yams and squash dominate my diet. You should look into metabolic typing, to further increase your knowledge.  We definitely ALL need proteins for tissue-repair. With that said, metabolism determines wether we thrive on carbohydrate OR fats as our main energy source. Not everyone thrives solely on fats!</p>
<p>As far as foods, I completely disagree with your view on animals as the ONLY source. I can tell you have definitely studied the lack luster paleo diet! For myself, I consume plants AND animals with plants as the staple. I do agree that animals make a great food source. In turn, I won&#8217;t touch the standard commercial animal-products as these are far from optimal choices. I would much prefer to hunt wild, natural game like elk or ostrich as my animal choices. One good elk should last for a month or two. Ideally as humans, we will get the most out of an animal who could actually eat us. Like a lion. I desire to consume a lion. After all, we are what we eat. Why not make it to the top of the food chain? Lion meat, would be bomb.</p>
<p>Dairy is not an ideal food choice. It is made by cows for their calves who are in the infantry stage. These calves are too young to find foods on their own, and therefore must drink their mother&#8217;s milk, straight from the source. As for humans, breast-milk is the far superior-choice as it is tailor-made for our species. Only I&#8217;m not going to drink that shit ha ha. It is VERY nutritious, though only necessary for infants.</p>
<p>So much to talk about, in this vast subject.</p>
<p>P.S. None the less, good article man. I like some of your points and insights. </p>
<p>JEFF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug McGuff: What to Eat, What Not to Eat&#160;&#124;&#160;The Dream Lounge</title>
		<link>http://www.thedreamlounge.net/2010/01/05/the-quest-for-nutritional-truth-why-i-eat-the-way-i-eat/comment-page-1/#comment-5673</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug McGuff: What to Eat, What Not to Eat&#160;&#124;&#160;The Dream Lounge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedreamlounge.net/?p=1225#comment-5673</guid>
		<description>[...] it was an outstanding refresh for my own knowldge in the field. For my mother, who was being introduced to the idea for the first time? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it was an outstanding refresh for my own knowldge in the field. For my mother, who was being introduced to the idea for the first time? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
