Love — No Contradictions Possible

I made the color scheme of this blog black and white long ago. While it has always attracted a polarization of the topics discussed, this seems to have increased as time has passed, resulting in a quality of comments that  are increasingly rational on one end, and increasingly irrational on the other. Readers of this blog, more and more, are getting it, or not getting it at all.

And I am pleased to see it.

~~~

Eva, a recent commenter on this blog, left some counterfeit gems of wisdom that I am now going to selectively rip apart for the lies that they are.

Here is the full comment (link)

Love means different things to different people. I’m sorry to hear that your entire purpose in life is this selfish concept that you have defined for yourself according to some book you have read. The video does not refer to romantic love, but love in general. There is nothing wrong with selfish love, to each their own. Perhaps it is a feminine perspective, however that is where the imbalance in our world is. If men and woman cannot agree to how define love then how can they engage in it mutually?

Calling someone a “moron, riddled with contradictions like a whore with more STDs than she can count” is immature. Naming someone an “idiot” for their opinion and labeling selfless love a “deadly sin” just proves you are a deeply self-absorbed person with no regard for others. I do not know why any woman would ever want a relationship with you, but I wish you the best of luck in finding your “one million percent selfish” romantic relationship.

 “Love means different things to different people.”

No kidding. Love, like food, exercise, and rape, is a victim of word inflation. It is used so generally, so widely, and with such a profound lack of even the most basic definition, that it has become almost meaningless.

This is largely thanks to people like Eva, who choose not to think, and instead wish.

To the contrary, words have exact meanings, including “love” — and I’ll be the first to say that when you are dealing with words, you are dealing with the mind (which is why exact definitions are so important to form).

Love, to be exact, in the most general and fundamental sense, is to value.

Remember this — to VALUE.

~~~

“I’m sorry to hear that your entire purpose in life is this selfish concept that you have defined for yourself according to some book you have read. “

This is perhaps one of the top ten most stupid sentences I have read over the course of my entire life. The exact meaning of this sentence is that Eva is sorry that I discovered, absorbed, and judged the validity of new knowledge to be in alignment with reality, and have subsequently incorporated it into the entirety of my life.

This is anti-reason in 2011, and anti-life.

What’s more, Eva, who I am assuming is a woman, has attempted to use the word selfish as an insult/derogatory term.

The fact is, I am proud of my selfishness, almost more than anything else in the world (the only thing I am more proud of, I think, are the real world results I have been able to produce as a direct result of acting in my own rational self-interest).

~~~

“The video does not refer to romantic love, but love in general.”

Romantic love is a derivative of love in the general sense. You cannot speak of romantic love and at the same time dismiss “love” in and of itself. To do so is a contradiction in terms and concepts — this is revealed on the computer screen I am looking at right now, let alone in abstract thought.

  • Romantic love
  • Love

Need I say more?

That idiotic, insane, irrational woman in the love video in that post made attacks on all forms of love — and she is deserving of every word I said about her for that exercise in stupidity.

~~~

“There is nothing wrong with selfish love, to each their own.”

As you reveal in further discussion, what you mean by “to each their own”, is a dismissal of the fact of reality that love and selfishness go hand in hand.

In a detached, underhand way, you deny that existence exists by stating that selfless love is possible.

That you can value some thing without you being a part of the process.

But this begs the question … who is doing the valuing?

~~~

“If men and woman cannot agree to how define love then how can they engage in it mutually?”

For once, you are partly right, they can’t engage in [romantic] love unless and until the definition of love is agreed upon, implicitly or explicitly.

It is entirely within the realm of possibility though that they can however, agree — and be right.

~~~

“Calling someone a “moron, riddled with contradictions like a whore with more STDs than she can count” is immature.”

I would agree, if it were not a statement that reflected reality.

It is. That woman in the video is a complete and utter moron, and intellectually promiscuous at best, and to say the least.

~~~

“Naming someone an “idiot” for their opinion and labeling selfless love a “deadly sin” just proves you are a deeply self-absorbed person with no regard for others. “

Despite popular opinion, the root of all evil is not totalitarianism, communism, socialism, fascism, collectivism, or even altruism (which should not be confused with benevolence) — it is irrationality.

It is man’s refusal to think, to trust the judgement of his own mind, and his rejection of the axiom that existence exists.

Which is exactly what that woman in the video did. To attempt to engage in “selfless love” is to attempt to force a contradiction into reality, which is to say, to deny the validity of man’s mind, his ability to reason, and to deny reality itself.

There is no such thing as selfless love. This is true in the same way and for the same reasons that no good on earth can be achieved or advanced by the initiation of force.

Force is only valid in defense.

A=A

When you deny that single valid justification for acts of violence, you are denying that A=A — that the chair you are sitting on is the chair you are sitting on.

The same is true when you deny that a self is required to perform a process of valuing — you are denying existence, your self, and your mind.

A deadly sin is to gentle a term.

It’s evil.

~~~

“I do not know why any woman would ever want a relationship with you, but I wish you the best of luck in finding your “one million percent selfish” romantic relationship.”

Men of ability do not rely on “luck”. You can keep it — I’d rather kill myself than accept it from you.

— Anthony Dream Johnson

 

About Anthony Dream Johnson

CEO, founder, and architect of The 21 Convention, Anthony Dream Johnson is the leading force behind the world's first and only "panorama event for life on earth". He has been featured on WGN Chicago, and in the NY Times #1 best seller The Four Hour Work Week.    His stated purpose for the work he does is "the actualization of the ideal man", a purpose that has led him to found and host The 21 Convention across 3 continents and for 6 years in a row. Anthony blogs vigorously at TheDreamLounge.net and Declarationism.com.

4 Responses to Love — No Contradictions Possible

  1. Daniel August 17, 2011 at 12:00 am #

    I am so glad be able to finally see what I thought on paper. There IS no problem with being selfish with love because it belongs to you. There is no one that can take it away and is an emotion that can bring absolute joy. So if I’m selfish for desiring an emotion and a person to go along with it than being selfish is a good thing. People confuse being selfish with only serving yourself. Being selfish is doing something important to you and having what you want if life become reality. Many of my true desires make it a MAIN PRIORITY to be serving people. So saying that being selfish with anything is a bad thing is wrong (unless you take from others maliciously) because most people, when they do what they truly want in life, want to serve people for their own reasons be it something big like starting a revolution to something small like helping one guy get out of bad times in his life. From what I can tell Anthony you have it right. It is a lie that in order to do or have something great that you can’t value it selfishly because like you said you can’t be selfless and value something because selfishness is derived from valuing something. Sorry to basically repeat what you said, but like I wrote in the beginning I take the notion of not lying to yourself and not admitting you have a stake in all things you do incredibly absurd.

  2. Bo August 18, 2011 at 8:46 pm #

    I feel sorry for you. Selfishness is not something to be proud of. Everybody can have their own opinion on the subject of love, it doesn’t mean we have to jump on each other and critize so thouroughly. And by the way, I completely agree with the girl in the video.

    • Anthony Dream Johnson August 18, 2011 at 9:52 pm #

      I pity you, and that is not a good thing.

      Selfishness is man’s greatest virtue, and it is absolutely something to take pride in when exercised successfully.

      Everybody can have their own opinion on love — but mine is a reflection of reality. Hers, and yours, is not.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Dating — No Contradictions Possible | The Dream Lounge - September 9, 2011

    […] is in a way a follow up to Love – No Contradictions Possible. In fact I may just make a series out of this and shred contradictions to pieces in a variety of […]

Make your mark